Home > Blog > Nursing Home Insurance and Judgment-Proofing: What Families Should Know Before Filing Suit

Nursing Home Insurance and Judgment-Proofing: What Families Should Know Before Filing Suit

You win your nursing home lawsuit. The jury awards $400,000 in damages.

You call to collect.

And you learn the nursing home’s insurance policy is capped at $250,000. The facility itself owns no real assets. The building is owned by a separate company. The management company is another entity entirely. And after legal fees and expert costs, there’s $30,000 left to divide among all the claimants.

A judgment is only as good as the entity’s ability to pay. Some nursing homes are deliberately structured to be uncollectible.

This post explains what families need to know about nursing home insurance — and what smart attorneys investigate before filing suit.

The Truth About Nursing Home Insurance That Most Families Don’t Hear

Many families assume: “The nursing home has insurance. If we win, insurance pays.”

The reality is more complicated.

First: not all nursing homes carry the same level of insurance. A major health system operating multiple facilities may carry $5 million or more in coverage. A smaller, independent facility might carry $250,000. A bare-minimum facility might carry even less.

Second: the nursing home owner often has a financial incentive to carry minimal insurance. The less insurance they buy, the less they spend on premiums each year. If they think they won’t be sued, or that most suits will settle for peanuts, they buy cheap coverage and take the risk.

Third: the facility’s insurance is the facility’s insurance. It doesn’t cover the parent company (if one exists). It doesn’t cover the management company. It doesn’t cover individual doctors or staff members (they have their own coverage, or they don’t). Multiple insurance policies may exist, with different coverage limits and exclusions, and lawyers on different sides fighting over who pays what.

For a family pursuing a nursing home claim, these details matter. A lot.

Eroding Policies: How the Defense Eats the Payout

Here’s how nursing home insurance policies work:

The policy has two numbers: a per-claim limit and an annual aggregate limit.

Per-claim limit: $250,000 per incident. That’s the maximum the insurer will pay for one claimant’s damages.

Aggregate limit: $500,000 per year. That’s the maximum the insurer will pay for all claims that year, combined.

Now imagine a facility with bad practices. Three families file suits. Three families win. Three claims hit the insurance.

The math:

• Claim 1: $200,000 paid from policy.
• Claim 2: $200,000 paid from policy. (Total: $400,000 of $500,000 aggregate spent.)
• Claim 3: The aggregate is hit. Even if the jury awards $300,000, insurance only pays $100,000 to fill the annual aggregate limit. The rest comes from… nowhere.

Families are racing to get paid from the same pot.

But there’s another erosion factor: defense costs.

Many nursing home policies have a feature called “defense costs inside the aggregate” or “defense costs outside the aggregate.” If defense costs are inside the aggregate, then every dollar the facility’s lawyers spend on the defense — depositions, expert witnesses, court filings, appeals — comes out of the same money that’s supposed to pay the family.

A strong nursing home defense in a significant case can cost $100,000 to $300,000 or more in legal fees and expert costs. That money comes from the insurance policy. By the time you get to trial, the policy has fewer dollars left.

If the family’s judgment exceeds what’s left, the shortfall is the family’s problem. The nursing home has no assets to cover it.

Aggregate Caps and the Race to Collect

Here’s a scenario we’ve seen:

A nursing home facility has chronic staffing problems and poor infection control. Over two years, multiple residents suffer serious infections or fall-related injuries. Three families decide to sue. The cases settle or go to trial at different times.

Family A’s case settles first: $180,000 from insurance.

Family B’s case goes to trial, wins: $250,000 judgment, paid by insurance.

Family C’s case is still pending, but insurance’s aggregate for that year is now exhausted. Even if Family C wins $300,000 at trial, the nursing home’s insurance won’t pay a dime more that year. Family C is unsecured.

This is not hypothetical. It’s why attorneys are sometimes aggressive about early settlement discussions. It’s not just about the strength of the case; it’s about getting to the insurance money before someone else does.

It’s also why some families, presented with a settlement offer that seems low, feel cheated — and then learn later that if they’d refused it and gone to trial, the insurance money would have run out and they’d have collected nothing.

Shell Companies and Judgment-Proof Structures

Here’s the structure that shows up again and again:

• The operating company: ABC Nursing Care, LLC. This is the entity with the nursing license, that actually operates the facility, and that gets sued.
• The real estate company: DEF Real Estate Holdings, LLC. This company owns the building and equipment. It charges ABC Nursing Care rent each month.
• The management company: GHI Management Services, LLC. This company handles billing, staffing, purchasing, and “business operations.” It charges ABC Nursing Care a fee for these services.

The economic result: ABC Nursing Care takes in revenue, but almost all of it flows out as rent to DEF, as management fees to GHI, and as payroll to staff. By the end of the month, ABC has almost nothing. The real money (the equity in the building, the savings from operations) sits in DEF and GHI, which are owned by different entities (often the same parent company, but structured separately for liability reasons).

When a family wins a judgment against ABC Nursing Care, there’s nothing to collect. The operating company is hollow. The assets are elsewhere.

This is not accident. It’s intentional. It’s called “judgment-proofing,” and it’s legal (though sometimes attackable under veil-piercing theories under Illinois law).

A smart attorney will investigate the corporate structure early. Is ABC Nursing Care owned by a parent company? Does the parent company have assets? Can a judgment pierce the corporate veil and reach the parent? (Under Illinois law, veil-piercing requires showing unity of interest and control, plus wrongful conduct. See Eads v. Heritage Enterprises, Inc., 204 Ill. 2d 92 (2003)). Are there other subsidiaries with deeper pockets? These questions matter before you spend $30,000 on expert witnesses.

What This Means for Your Family’s Case

If you’re considering a nursing home lawsuit, here’s what you need to understand:

Insurance capacity matters. If the nursing home carries $250,000 in coverage and your damages are $500,000, you’re fighting over who collects what fraction of the insurance money. That changes the settlement calculus.

Timing matters. If other families are also suing the same facility, and the aggregate for that year is limited, being first to trial or to a settlement offer might be advantageous (or disadvantageous, depending on the facts).

Corporate structure matters. If the operating company is a hollow shell and the real assets are held elsewhere, your attorney needs a strategy for piercing the veil or identifying the real defendant.

Cost-benefit analysis matters. An attorney on contingency is investing their own money in expert witnesses and litigation costs. If the potential recovery is capped at $250,000 and the defense will cost $150,000 to fight, the attorney’s net (after their contingency cut and costs) might be $25,000 to $50,000. Some cases aren’t economically viable for a plaintiff’s attorney, even if they’re legally strong, because the insurance money isn’t there.

This is why some families call multiple attorneys and hear “no” from each one. It’s often not because the case is weak; it’s because the financial recovery doesn’t justify the costs.

How the Illinois Nursing Home Care Act Helps

There’s one provision in the Illinois Nursing Home Care Act that partially addresses this problem: attorney fee shifting.

Under 210 ILCS 45/3-602, if a family proves a violation of the Nursing Home Care Act and recovers damages, the judgment includes attorney fees awarded on top of the damages verdict. So if a jury awards $100,000 in damages, and attorney fees are $75,000, the total judgment is $175,000.

This helps. It means that even in lower-value cases, if they’re legally strong, an attorney may be willing to take them because fees are recoverable.

But fee-shifting only works if there’s a recovery. And it only applies to violations of the Nursing Home Care Act (negligence, abuse, neglect, etc.). It doesn’t apply to cases based on other legal theories.

Fee-shifting also doesn’t fix the insurance cap problem. If insurance covers $250,000, and the jury awards $100,000 in damages plus $75,000 in fees, that $175,000 still comes from the same insurance policy.

What an Attorney Should Investigate Before Filing

A competent nursing home attorney will do the following before filing suit:

1. Identify the real defendant. Who operates the facility? Is there a parent company, management company, or holding company? Which entities control decision-making about staffing, training, and care standards?

2. Identify the insurance coverage. Early in the case (often through a Rule 213(f) discovery request under Illinois law), the attorney will demand information about insurance. Policy limits, aggregate limits, coverage exclusions, and defense costs provisions all matter.

3. Estimate assets. What real property does the facility own? Are there bank accounts, equipment, or other assets that could satisfy a judgment?

4. Investigate the corporate structure. Are the operating company and the parent company separate entities? Can a veil-piercing claim reach the parent? Under Eads, veil-piercing in nursing home cases requires showing that the parent company exercised dominion and control over the subsidiary AND that upholding the corporate structure would produce an inequitable result. This is a high bar.

5. Calculate the financial viability. What will the case cost in expert fees, deposition transcripts, and litigation? How much can realistically be recovered? Do the numbers make sense?

If, after this investigation, the insurance is minimal and the facility is judgment-proof, a good attorney will tell the family: “We can pursue this, but the financial recovery may be limited. Here’s what I think we can collect, and here’s what it will cost to try.” The family then decides whether to proceed.

FAQs

Can I sue the parent company directly if the operating company is judgment-proof?

Maybe. Illinois law allows piercing the corporate veil in limited circumstances. Under Eads v. Heritage Enterprises, Inc., 204 Ill. 2d 92 (2003), you need to show: (1) the parent company exercised dominion and control over the subsidiary, not just ownership; and (2) upholding the corporate structure would be inequitable. This is a difficult standard to meet. Your attorney should investigate whether the parent company made decisions about the facility’s nursing care, staffing levels, or training policies. If it did, veil-piercing is more likely. If the parent just collected money from the subsidiary and otherwise left it alone, veil-piercing is harder.

What if the nursing home’s insurance company refuses to pay?

Insurance disputes happen. The insurer might argue that a particular injury was excluded from coverage, or that the facility violated the policy terms (e.g., by failing to report an incident within a certain time). If the insurer refuses to pay your judgment, your attorney can sue the insurance company in a separate action. This typically requires showing that the policy clearly covered the loss and that the insurer acted in bad faith in denying it. The process takes time and money, but it’s a remedy if the insurance wrongfully withholds payment.

Does the nursing home have to carry insurance?

Illinois does not require nursing homes to carry malpractice or liability insurance. However, most nursing homes do carry some coverage because lenders or owners require it, or because it’s standard industry practice. Some facilities carry minimal coverage. If a facility carries no insurance, your recovery is limited to whatever assets the facility itself owns — often very little. This is another reason why investigating the facility’s assets and structure is crucial early in the case.

If the facility settles with me, can it still be sued by other families?

Yes. A settlement with one family doesn’t prevent other families from suing the same facility. However, if the settlement depletes the facility’s insurance (or a large portion of it), later families will have fewer insurance dollars available. This is why some families with pending claims worry about other settlements eating into the aggregate limit.

What if I’m told the case “isn’t economically viable”?

This is attorney-speak for: “The costs to litigate exceed the likely recovery.” It’s frustrating, but it reflects reality. If the nursing home carries $200,000 in insurance, the defense will cost $120,000, and the family’s damages are disputed, the attorney may conclude that the financial risk isn’t worth it. But this doesn’t mean the family has no options. Consult multiple attorneys. Ask about contingency arrangements, shared costs, or alternative fee structures. Some attorneys may take the case even if the economics are tight because they believe in it, or because they’re part of a larger firm that can absorb the cost.

Nursing home residents deserve to be treated with dignity. If you suspect neglect or abuse, our Peoria personal injury attorneys can help hold the responsible parties accountable.

Related Articles

• Nursing Home Injury — Our Practice Hub
• What Kind of Nursing Home Neglect Settlement Can I Expect?
• Why Is It Difficult to Find a Nursing Home Neglect Attorney?
• For-Profit Nursing Homes: Everyone Pays but Them